🔗 Share this article

The real-life crime category has a new medium, or perhaps even a whole new language and grammar: officer-worn camera recordings. Faces of victims, witnesses and possible perpetrators loom up to the cameras, at times in the intense brightness of vehicle beams or torches as the police arrive, their faces and voices eloquent of caution or fear or anger or dubiously feigned naivety. And we frequently catch sight of the expressions of the officers themselves, one waiting impassively while the other conducts the inquiry with what occasionally seems like remarkable hesitation – though perhaps this is because they know they are being recorded.

An Emerging Pattern in Non-Fiction Cinema

We have already had the Netflix true-crime documentary American Murder: Gabby Petito, about the killing of an Instagram influencer by her partner, whose primary focus was officer recordings and in which, as in this film, the police seemed extraordinarily lax with the perpetrator. There is also the acclaimed short film Incident by Bill Morrison, made exclusively of body cam film. Now comes Geeta Gandbhir’s documentary about the tragic incident of a Florida mother in Ocala, Florida, a woman of colour whose four young kids allegedly harassed and antagonized her neighbor, a local resident. In 2023, after an increasing number of neighborhood conflicts in which the authorities were repeatedly called, the accused shot Owens dead through her locked door, when the victim went to Lorincz’s house to address her about hurling items at her children.

The Police Inquiry and State Laws

The arresting officers found proof that Lorincz had done online research into the state's self-defense statutes, which permit residents and others to use firearms if there is a significant presumption of threat. The documentary builds its story with the officer recordings generated during the multiple officer calls to the location before the shooting, and then at the disturbing and disordered crime scene itself – introduced by emergency call recordings of the caller contacting authorities in a melodramatically shaky voice. There is also police cell footage of Lorincz which has a chilly, queasy fascination.

Depiction of the Suspect

The film does not really suggest anything too complicated about Lorincz, or any mitigating factors. She is obviously disturbed, although the children are heard calling her a derogatory term, an ugly jibe. The production is presented as an example of how self-defense regulations generate unnecessary and heartbreaking bloodshed. But the reality of gun ownership and the second amendment (that historic American constitutional privilege that a late commentator famously claimed made gun deaths a necessary cost) is not much emphasized.

Officer Questioning and Firearm Norms

It is feasible to watch the officer questioning segments here and feel surprised at how little interest the officers took in this point. When did she buy her gun? Where (if anywhere) did she train in its use? Had she ever had occasion to fire it before? Where did she store it in the house? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The authorities aren’t shown asking any of these surely relevant questions (though they could have inquired in footage that were not included). Or is possessing a firearm so normal it would be like asking about microwaves or toasters?

Detention and Consequences

For what seemed to her neighbors a very long time, the suspect was not even taken into custody and indicted, only held and even provided accommodation away from home for the night (another point of comparison, incidentally, with the Gabby Petito case). And when she was finally formally arrested in the detention area, there is an remarkable scene in which Lorincz simply declines to rise, will not extend her arms for the cuffs, not hostilely, but with the politely self-pitying air of someone whose mental health means that she is unable to comply. Did the gentle handling up until that point encouraged her to think that this might actually work?

Conclusion and Verdict

It was not successful; and the jury’s verdict is saved for the end titles. A very sombre picture of American crime and punishment.